Articles of Association do not automatically override a shareholders’ agreement in every situation. The two documents have different legal functions.

The Articles govern the company’s formal procedures and bind the company and its members. A shareholders’ agreement is a private contract that binds only the people or organisations that are parties to it.

If the documents conflict, a company decision may be valid under the Articles while still causing one or more shareholders to breach the shareholders’ agreement.

What Is the Legal Status of the Articles?

The Articles form part of the company’s constitution and contain the formal rules for running the company.

They commonly cover:

  • Directors’ authority
  • Board meetings and voting
  • Shareholder resolutions
  • Share issues
  • Share transfers
  • Dividend procedures
  • Rights attached to different share classes
  • Appointment and removal of directors

Under section 33 of the Companies Act 2006, the company’s constitution binds the company and its members.

A person who becomes a registered shareholder will generally become subject to the Articles in their capacity as a member.

What Is the Legal Status of a Shareholders’ Agreement?

A shareholders’ agreement is a private contract between some or all of the shareholders. The company may also become a party to it.

It may cover:

  • Reserved decisions
  • Share-transfer restrictions
  • Funding commitments
  • Dividend policies
  • Appointment of directors
  • Confidentiality
  • Minority shareholder protections
  • Deadlock procedures
  • Good-leaver and bad-leaver provisions
  • Drag-along and tag-along rights
  • Sale of the company
  • Dispute resolution

Only the parties to the agreement are normally bound by it. A new shareholder does not automatically become a party simply because they acquire shares.

What Happens If the Documents Conflict?

The result depends on the particular provision and action involved.

For example, the Articles may allow a company decision to be approved by shareholders holding 75% of the votes. The shareholders’ agreement may state that the same decision requires unanimous approval.

If shareholders holding 75% approve the decision:

  • The resolution may be valid under the Articles and company law.
  • The shareholders who supported it may have breached the shareholders’ agreement.
  • The other parties may have a contractual claim.
  • The company action will not necessarily become invalid simply because the agreement was breached.

This is why neither document can be said to override the other in every circumstance.

Do the Articles Control Company Procedures?

Generally, yes. The Articles govern the formal corporate procedures that directors and shareholders must follow.

They determine matters such as:

  • Whether a board meeting has a quorum
  • How directors vote
  • Whether a share transfer can be registered
  • Which shareholders can vote
  • What majority is required
  • How directors are appointed
  • What rights attach to shares

A shareholders’ agreement does not automatically amend these constitutional rules.

Can a Shareholders’ Agreement Take Priority Between the Parties?

The shareholders’ agreement may contain a priority clause stating that its terms take priority if it conflicts with the Articles.

Such a clause can be effective as a contractual promise between the parties. It may require the shareholders to:

  • Vote in a particular way
  • Amend the Articles
  • Avoid exercising a constitutional power
  • Take steps to resolve the inconsistency

However, the clause does not automatically rewrite the Articles or alter the company’s formal procedures. Until the Articles are properly amended, a conflicting corporate action may still be valid even though it breaches the agreement.

Can the Shareholders’ Agreement Change the Articles?

No. Signing a shareholders’ agreement does not itself amend the Articles.

To change the Articles, the company must normally:

  1. Prepare the amended Articles.
  2. Pass a special resolution.
  3. Obtain at least 75% approval under the applicable voting procedure.
  4. File the special resolution with Companies House.
  5. File the amended Articles with Companies House.

The required documents must normally be filed within 15 days of the relevant event.

Can the Agreement Require Something the Articles Prohibit?

The parties may agree to take steps to amend the Articles, but a private contract cannot make an unlawful company action valid.

A shareholders’ agreement cannot:

  • Override the Companies Act 2006
  • Authorise directors to breach their legal duties
  • Bind shareholders who are not parties
  • Remove statutory protections
  • Make an unlawful distribution lawful
  • Automatically change registered share rights

Any provision requiring an unlawful action may be unenforceable.

What Remedies Are Available for a Conflict?

If a shareholder breaches the shareholders’ agreement, the other parties may seek contractual remedies.

Depending on the agreement and circumstances, these may include:

  • Compensation
  • An injunction
  • An order requiring compliance
  • Enforcement of a compulsory-transfer provision
  • A contractual buyout
  • Dispute-resolution procedures
  • Termination rights

If the company breaches its Articles, different company-law remedies may be available, including challenging the validity of a decision or seeking an order requiring the company to follow its constitution.

Are New Shareholders Bound by Both Documents?

A new shareholder will generally become bound by the Articles when entered in the company’s register of members.

They will not normally be bound by the shareholders’ agreement unless they sign:

  • The agreement itself
  • A deed of adherence
  • Another legally effective accession document

The Articles and shareholders’ agreement should require a buyer to join the agreement before a share transfer is approved or registered, where appropriate.

What If the Company Is Not a Party to the Agreement?

If the company has not signed the shareholders’ agreement, it will not normally be contractually bound by it.

The agreement may still require its shareholder parties to use their voting rights to cause the company to take specified actions. However, directors must continue to exercise independent judgement and comply with their statutory duties.

Adding the company as a party may make some obligations easier to enforce, but the company cannot agree to restrictions that unlawfully prevent it from exercising statutory powers.

Should Important Rights Be Included in Both Documents?

Important constitutional protections are often included in the Articles, while more detailed or confidential arrangements are included in the shareholders’ agreement.

Matters commonly addressed in both include:

  • Share-transfer restrictions
  • Pre-emption rights
  • Director appointment rights
  • Reserved decisions
  • New share issues
  • Drag-along rights
  • Tag-along rights
  • Compulsory transfers

The provisions should be drafted consistently.

How Can Conflicts Be Prevented?

A company can reduce the risk by:

  • Drafting both documents at the same time
  • Reviewing existing model Articles
  • Defining key terms consistently
  • Using matching voting thresholds
  • Requiring new shareholders to sign a deed of adherence
  • Including a process for resolving conflicts
  • Reviewing both documents before issuing or transferring shares
  • Updating both documents when ownership changes
  • Obtaining legal advice before major transactions

Summary

Articles of Association do not automatically override a shareholders’ agreement in every situation.

The Articles control the company’s formal constitutional procedures and bind the company and its members. The shareholders’ agreement creates private contractual obligations between its parties.

A company action may therefore be valid under the Articles but still breach the shareholders’ agreement. The safest approach is to ensure that both documents are consistent and reviewed together whenever the company’s ownership or management arrangements change.

This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice.

‍

‍
UKcompany.blog assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this website or blog. The information contained in this website or blog is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, or timeliness.