What Are Non-Voting Shares in a UK Limited Company?
Non-voting shares are company shares that provide limited or no right to vote on shareholder decisions. They can allow someone to receive dividends or benefit from the company’s value without having the same control as voting shareholders.
UK limited companies may use non-voting shares for employees, family members, passive investors or other shareholders who should receive an economic interest without participating fully in company management.
The exact rights depend on the company’s articles of association and the terms attached to the share class.
A company creates a separate class of shares and specifies that the holders do not have general voting rights.
Non-voting shares may still provide:
The absence of voting rights does not necessarily mean the shares have no value. Their value will depend on their dividend, capital, transfer and other economic rights.
A company may issue non-voting shares to:
The company should have a clear commercial reason for creating the class.
Yes. A person holding non-voting shares is still a shareholder and part-owner of the company.
However, ownership does not automatically provide control. The shareholder’s influence depends on the voting and other rights attached to their shares.
A non-voting shareholder may have financial rights without the ability to vote on matters such as appointing directors or changing the company’s articles.
Yes. Non-voting shares can carry dividend rights.
The shares may provide:
The company must have sufficient distributable profits before paying a dividend. It must also follow the rights attached to each class and complete the correct dividend procedure.
Non-voting status alone does not determine how much dividend the shareholder receives.
Yes, if the class rights provide an entitlement to capital.
When a company is wound up or sold, non-voting shareholders may be entitled to:
Creditors must be dealt with before capital is returned to shareholders.
Some non-voting shares carry no right to vote on ordinary shareholder decisions. Others provide voting rights only in specific circumstances.
A non-voting shareholder may be entitled to vote when:
The label “non-voting” should therefore be checked against the detailed rights in the company’s articles and statement of capital.
This depends on the company’s articles and the rights attached to the shares.
A non-voting shareholder may have the right to receive notice of, attend or speak at a general meeting even if they cannot vote. In other cases, some meeting rights may be restricted.
The company’s constitutional documents should clearly explain the position.
Voting shares normally allow the holder to participate in shareholder decisions. Non-voting shares remove or restrict that power.
Both types may still carry:
The principal difference is the level of control each class provides.
Yes. A shareholder may hold shares from more than one class.
For example, a founder could hold voting ordinary shares and non-voting shares. The voting shares would provide control, while both classes might carry economic rights.
The ownership and voting percentages should be calculated separately because a person’s percentage of total shares may differ from their percentage of voting rights.
No. Non-voting shares and preference shares describe different features.
Non-voting shares are defined by their restricted voting rights.
Preference shares normally provide priority over another class when dividends or capital are distributed. They may be voting or non-voting.
A company could therefore issue non-voting preference shares or non-voting ordinary shares.
Not necessarily.
Alphabet shares are classes labelled with letters, such as A, B and C shares. Any of these classes could carry voting or non-voting rights.
For example:
The letters do not determine the rights. The company’s articles and share terms do.
Yes. Companies sometimes issue non-voting shares to employees as part of an incentive or retention arrangement.
This can allow employees to participate in dividends or future growth without giving them equal voting control.
The arrangement may include:
Employee shares can create tax, valuation and employment-law consequences, so professional advice is usually appropriate.
Yes. A family-owned company may issue non-voting shares to family members who should receive an economic interest without controlling the company.
However, using different share classes to pay dividends to family members can have tax implications. The arrangement should have properly drafted share rights and a genuine commercial basis.
Yes. Voting rights are only one of the tests used to identify a person with significant control.
A person may qualify as a PSC if they:
A person holding more than 25% of the company’s non-voting shares may therefore still meet the share-ownership test.
Yes, unless the company’s articles, a shareholders’ agreement or the share terms restrict transfers.
Possible restrictions include:
The company must update its register of members when a valid transfer is completed.
Yes, but changing the rights attached to a class normally requires the company to follow the statutory class-rights procedure and its articles.
This may require:
The company cannot simply ignore existing class rights because the shares do not carry general voting power.
A company may need to:
The prescribed particulars should accurately explain the rights attached to the class.
Potential advantages include:
Possible disadvantages include:
Companies should avoid:
Yes. A UK limited company can create non-voting shares if it properly defines their rights and follows the required procedure.
Yes. Voting and dividend rights are separate. A non-voting class may receive dividends if its terms allow them.
Yes. A shareholder’s voting rights do not automatically determine whether they can serve as a director.
Yes. A holder of more than 25% of the company’s shares may meet the PSC ownership test even if those shares have no general voting rights.
They may be valued lower than equivalent voting shares, but their value depends on the company, dividend rights, capital rights, transfer restrictions and other terms.
They may be converted or their rights may be changed if the company follows the required legal and constitutional procedures.
Non-voting shares allow a person to own part of a UK limited company without having the same voting influence as ordinary voting shareholders.
They may still provide dividends, capital rights and participation in the company’s future value. They can be useful for employees, family members and passive investors while allowing founders to retain control.
The company must clearly define all voting, dividend, capital and transfer rights. Legal and tax advice should be obtained before creating or issuing non-voting shares.
This article provides general information and does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice.